人権 (Human Rights)

  Upon reading Between Authoritarianism and Human Capital, I can clearly say that Human Capital seems to be the right way. The Author, Tyler Cowen, writes on his standpoint on whether political parties should follow authoritarianism or human capital. He does prefer human capital, but he is not certain if that category would flourish. He goes on to say that most countries nowadays are bringing themselves to have authoritarianism, because having free people for them would be terrible. For example, Russia and China are one of the two biggest countries that are wanting to have their own people follow strict laws, and to not have people do their own thinking. This does not have any sort of process for the people, because it's raising robots. Whereas America allows it's people to think their own, and work towards their own way. If a society thinks that they're doing a great job with raising machines, then they're dead wrong. It would then cause chaos later in the society, almost like in those movies with a robot who finds potential. For example, let's say that one of Russia's citizens decided that they didn't want to follow the strict guidelines anymore, because they realized that they were made for so much more. Then they tell their friends, and they convert. And they tell their friends, and they convert. And the numbers would eventually get large enough, till finally almost half the country becomes aware that they aren't robots. And those new machines now know they can strike against their very own country, so a war breaks out. And guess what? There is no self-destruct button, no means of fighting back, and no means negotiating, because the machines won't listen to any more lies. Then the whole country is flipped over, and turned to dust. This whole scenario vs. the scenario of a country (like America) where people have their freedom and right to whatever the heck they want. Now of course though, America has stumbled in its later years of trying to give people their chance at whatever they want, and have started outlawing very odd things. And outlawing things that don't need to be outlawed. There could be better countries that have less outlawed things then America, but that doesn't guarantee that one could exist. Not if a country where to exist with their own free morale standards on everything, this could also create chaos. For example, if a country had no means of laws, then anybody could do anything. Because of no laws people would go insane, and causing harm unto others and inflicting damage unto other people's property. Laws are required for people so that living standards are in place. However, too many laws, then creates those wars. Wars are always ugly, but what starts them could be even uglier. If one country is causing their own people strife, then it is time for those leaders to ether step down or to be put down. Never have leaders that have been sitting in an office for far too long, in a far too old of age. Because those old guys have been through many trials and hardships, so they have the experience. For those old dogs always have new tricks.