どうもありがとうございました。(Thank you very much!)

I want to thank you all for giving me a awesome time for the beginning of the year. This goes out to al of my class mates and my teachers, for letting me have a good time in Highschool, even though it will be my last year. And Thank you Mr. Bicknell for allowing me to pursue my dream of Japanese.






     Thank you all.

The C.I.A is in on it? なにいいいいいいいい

 

      Apparently in recent events, the government organization known as the C.I.A is accused (by citizens) that they were the ones who made Donald J. Trump our president. Earlier in the year, when the presidential debates where in place. The C.I.A was sending spies to Russia to cause hacking and chaos to make the debates look good in Trump's favor. Meaning, Trump was favored in the Soviet Union. I have reason to believe the same thing that most of these Americans are starting to believe, Trump and the C.I.A are working together. This is not a good thing. This means that Trump payed big bucks, or the C.I.A wanted Trump to be president. If this is true, then some big, bad things are going to happen. Even if the C.I.A aren't in on it, it seems that Trump and the Russian government are in an alliance. This could be very good, since America and Russia don't really get along well. If Trump can keep these relations with Russia, we could have one less thing to worry about. Unless... Trump's genes are part Russian! "Please, Lord if this is the case, were going to have more people go on rant's again." We already had people blame Obama for being part of Isis. So what if it appeared the same time Obama was in office? What does cheap words and rumors have against a man "you" voted for? Trump's relations with the Russian Government will help out the Unites States because of everything that has happened. Plus, having Russia come out of their shell is good for them. The country may be big, but there isn't many people. The government and the people could become, generally more kind and more forgiving. Not that the citizens haven't been kind, it's just the government. But is this Trump's ultimate goal? Perhaps. Or he's trying to recover something or someone that is hiding over there. Perhaps Edward Snowden is a piece that Trump needs for his game. The famous man who hacked our own government computers to bring out lies. Trump want's him dead. This could be extremely dangerous to Trump's relations with Russia, for they have agreed to keep Snowden alive. Trump has even threatened Snowden, that if he ever returned to America, he would be executed on the spot. Snowden even replying and sending out messages on how Trump is the wrong choice for America. This does not seem like a joke, these threats are very real, and may end up killing him. And by him I mean Trump. Russia will not tolerate this kind of behavior from Trump, even after the C.I.A spies tried "so hard" to get Trump liked by Russia. Trump may fail the very thing he's trying to develop. Nukes will finally be fired if Trump messes up with the Soviet Union. Snowden needs to also not return comments, because if he does, then Trump will just want to have a burning passion to murder Snowden even more. I love what Snowden has done. I love what Trumps says he's going to do. But between these two... I would want Snowden to stay alive, even if Trump stays our president. Because if he continues to threat Snowden, he'll be killed, cooked, and eaten alive!

ベッツィ・デボスは彼の上司ではないかもしれない。(Betsy Devos may not the Boss!)

         Donald J. Trump is completely wiping the slate clean, and hiring new people to his ranks. One of these people for the secretary of education, is Betsy Devos. A billionaire who created her own charter school, and has her own clinic. Her husband Dick Devos,(who is an heir to Amway) is in support of her and has helped her with many of her small projects like a play she once produced. However, her views on education are pretty strict. She does not want public schools to exist. She wants charters and private schools. This can be a bad thing, especially when she does not want poor people getting vouchers for schools. People need to be educated, no matter what life style they have. Someone like her better change her way of thinking fast, otherwise we're going to have a big problem on our hands. But the one thing that she will do, is get rid of Common Core. Thank God someone wants to get rid of it. She is supposedly a Christian, but her views of how the world should be will make her true identity shown. But the real question is. Why is she the new education secretary? Why did Trump choose her for the education? A business woman who has plenty of experience in the education field, seems to be the right person for the job. But what about her way of tearing down the public schools? If private schools only exist, where will the money come from? I do not believe that she is going to give up her billions of dollars just to make private schools. Because if the support of the government takes away these public schools, then the new private ones would have to be a little bit cheaper. Unless her plan is to make only the rich family's able to get education. If this is the case, America is going to have a fun ride for the next four years. we're going to have many snarky, rich punks. And poor, smart kind-hearted souls. Devos may be good but not entirely. However, when we compare her to Arne Duncan, then she is obviously better. When Duncan allowed Common Core into the U.S, he made a big mistake. Especially when he made fun of the parents who complained heavily about Common Core, he should have found a better solution. And yet, telling parents that Common Core is right and they are wrong, is completely in the wrong. Perhaps Devos will see reasoning, or perhaps not. We will need her to quickly change her resolve. Even though private schools are good, public schools are almost better. They allow any one to get a in, and give them a opportunity to learn. However, the government has to pay for it. So what if this is a good thing to take away public schools? That money could go something else important, like paying our debts to other countries. Perhaps all of these bad things could be a good thing, but only if private schools become cheaper. I believe it could go good or bad, Devos just might be the boss. But whatever is going to happen these next four years, it's going to be a bumpy ride.      

それは大統領ではありません！それは人々です！( I'ts not the President! It's the People!)

               When it was first established, many United States presidents where elected. Many good... and many bad. Donald J. Trump will be our next president, there is no stopping that. But has it always been the president controlling the U.S? No. It's the Senate, and it's senators. No one in the U.S can make a move to effect the country or other countries, without the permission of the Senate. Not many citizens remember about the Senate, so the blame things on presidents. The Senate are the ones responsible for electoral vote, so ultimately they control who is going to be president. Oh they knew what they were doing when they signed up to be a senator, they knew they could be the true ones in control of power. That's something they could've thought of, or they just thought the job would be fun. What ever the reason, they've got the power. From what I know, representatives from every state send the majority of votes to the Capital. But are they sending your vote? Yes... and no. I believe that "popular vote'' is the what all voters truly voted. So what is electoral vote? I believe that electoral vote is when the representatives of the states, decide that the votes should change up a bit. Now the change isn't significant, and barely noticeable. However it can effect the nation. Am I saying that someone deliberately sabotaged the votes? No... and yes. some one may have wanted trump to win, so they changed up the votes. This could kill people, or at least drive them insane. If our founding fathers saw what we were doing, they would ether kill themselves, start over the nation, or start a civil war against the U.S.A today! When the founding fathers first created the Constitution, they set laws. Those laws later were altered, or new ones were placed to replace the old ones. This country was built on politics and freedom fighters. But today, we have more politicians then fighters. That's not necessary a bad thing, but it isn't good ether. especially when those politics act like kings or celebrities. Our country was the most greatest country ever.(in it's time.) But now we have wimps who don't even want to use guns because "they cause violence". Yes they do! But normal citizens aren't the ones who are shooting good people, and they aren't the ones who have suicide bombings! So people! Protect yourselves! when, or if the time comes, you'll need to fight back! Our founding fathers fought for this country so that we could live in peace and harmony. So why are many Americans cowering in fear? And why are others blasting others away from the world? The answer... The evil knows the good is weak. If all of the good guys in all those cool movies were cowards, then the evil would take over and they know they could do it. The evil would rule the world. That is what is happening to America, all the bad people in the country know that they can kill because the good isn't going to do anything about it. And these people are losing everything they love, and blame government. Government is not to blame, people are. And regular people, who hate guns, ask for them to be outlawed. THAT IS NOT GOING TO HELP! How do you think people get these guns? they steel them! Outlaws, don't care about the laws, it is simple as that. What needs to happen is American citizens stand up and fight back, not just the regular soldiers, but the regular citizens. U.S.A is a beautiful country, so let us keep it that way. After all, America can't be great without people. Trump will be a leader to help make America great again, but the people will be the true ones making great again.      




      "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

ニューカリフォルニア (New California)

  
     California... a place where the Asian's travel, and the Mexican's enter. And become American citizens. But now Trump will be president, this scares a whole lot of people who are not white people. These other Americans did not, and still don't want Trump to be president. How are they showing their frustration? They're protesting. Rioting, and rampaging the streets. They will resist all that they can to prevent Trump from being president. Unfortunately, Trump will be president. So what is the next best thing? Build a wall around California. Make this state it's own country, as some already feel that it is. How can this work? Well many people in California love this state and everything in it, so I guarantee that it could become it's own new country. In fact many political people in California have believed for a very long time that it should be it's own country. Since it can survive on it's own without the help of other states, perhaps it will be it's own country. How will it become one? It will have to fight the U.S.A for it. And I do believe that the rest of America will fight back, then California will cower in fear. But what about the other Mexicans, Asians, and other colored races in the other states? Wouldn't they want to not have Trump as president? Yes! Absolutely! So, therefore, they are rioting. Those who riot against Trump, where those who support Hillary. Most of those who supported Hillary, where those of different color. But what is there to worry about? You Americans are the ones who vote and decide what rules come into play, not Trump. He just says yes to the rules. So if you Americans want to be in America. Then great! Stay in America! So what if Trump is a sexist (or was). So what if he's a racist. It doesn't matter, all that matters, is that voters send the right rules. What happen to the political system? Why is it all about media and famous people? This cannot be acceptable, American citizens need to stand strong. So, will California still be it's own country? Yeah, probably in the nearby future. But who is to say we can't stop it? Us Christians have to stand up to, and not fall. For the nation depends on it! I can guarantee you that is at least one Christian in every country, who is also supportive of their country no matter what. And as long as they follow God's laws, they'll be fine. Even those who aren't Christians, and live in other countries, they'll be supportive of their country all the way through. Even through the hard times, and the good times. So America. Listen to this. If other countries can live in poverty, or in riches. In hardships, or good. Then why can't we do the same? America is a great country, and will be forever. So if you really are proud to be an American, then show how damn proud you are.

   Do you remember what Thanksgiving is for? It's for thanking the Heavenly Father for all things, this includes the bad. Because there is good in bad. So your next prayer should be like this, "Dear Lord. I thank you for this free land I live in. And I thank you for the representative for our country. You chose him for something we do not know of yet, so let us give him a chance. Thank you for everything you've done. Amen."
If every American did that, then whole nation would be "under one God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all!

アメリカに希望がある (There is hope in America)

      Okay let's get down to it. The elections are finally over and guess who is are future president. (drum roll) Donald Trump! What?! Why is Trump going to be our president? There are so many things wrong with this?! Protests!   


    These are things the Hillary fans and those who didn't vote for Trump are, have, and will be saying. Is America doomed? No. We don't know unless we give Trump a chance in office. And speaking of that, he is not even in it yet! Why are people protesting when Trump isn't even in office? I think the people are the ones who are broken. Young Americans are looking for Daddy and Mommy, they need comfort in life and to make everything easy. Wake up stupid Americans! The world doesn't give you comfort like your parents do. So grow up and act your age! Something wonderful happened today that proves that the American Government isn't the one failing, Obama had asked Trump to come in. Our old President, (as much as ''evil as he seemed'') was being kind to our soon to be, new president Trump. Even Hillary Clinton had asked Trump if she could help Trump become "a good president''. Now, if these two can humble themselves to give congratulations to Trump, the Hell will not break loose. In fact, if I hear Christians complain, I'm going to go beat them up. Why? Because some of them think and say to God, "Why did you choose him?!" If God spoke to them I think he would say, ''Shut up! Your ways are not my ways! I chose him for a better purpose then you can see!" Also, Trump's heart might change. Because when someone is given responsibility, they take it seriously. So perhaps Trump will change the things might say and bulk up, and take it seriously.




  Now if those wimpy, baby Americans also bulk up, then perhaps we may have a better country. What are we going to do? Simple, us new generation of kids stand up and smack the old ones in their place. Anyone who wants things easy, is asking to be smacked. And anyone who wants things to just come to them is also asking to be smacked. These many young, stupid Americans are the ones who voted for Hillary. But thank God she isn't in. But this is the reason for the riots and protests, because many of the young Americans didn't get their free collage. Are we serious?! What is the point of collage if it isn't free? What's the point of working hard if collage is free? This could be just as saying that jobs shouldn't give out money, because collage was free. We need to have hardships in life, so that way we can understand rest. Rest is important, but we should not be using all the time. Because too much rest is bad for you. So Americans. Young, and old. Big, and small. Grow up and learn that this world isn't ours, and that we are not in control.


    So, to conclude, and recap. Donald Trump, new president. Riots and protests. People wanted free, hard work. Not going to happen. Sit down, shut up and accept it. Don't be a baby about it. And finally, give Trump a chance. God gives us more then two chances. So why not us? Who are supposed to be in the image of God, give Donald Trump a chance. The only way we can function, is to be working together with Trump, and him vice-versa. For this, is the only way to have hope in America.

  

中国が支配します (China will rule)

       As the Presidential debates between Trump and Hillary Clinton continue, it becomes a disaster. More and more chaos is happening from all of these lies and stupid things that these two are saying and doing. Is there hope? I believe no one knows. However, Americans have a choice to change the outcome of what is going down in our country. Unfortunately, American's don't want to vote because they have become lazy. What does this mean to America if no one votes? Nothing. Because these two got here on some popular vote, so this means they will be voted in again. But the problem will not just effect America, but the entire world. Because America has made trading partners, and enemies, many parts of the world will become scarred of who is elected. In a survey, America was seen as the most powerful country in the world. Right.? A country full of debt to other countries, and struggling with the power of democracy. This is the most powerful country in the world? I don't think so. In a recent survey, it says that China is rising. They are dropping democracy, but not their president. President Xi Jinping, has been voted to become a one man ruler of China. It seems that there might be influence, since America and China have been good friends for a very long time. I am pretty sure that China Believes(while watching the presidential debates) that democracy is a flawed system, and shouldn't be used. And many other countries look up to both of these super-powers, if they see one succeeding in ether democracy, or one man rule, they Will follow that one. And since most of the world does not know why America was founded on Democracy, they do not understand why we still, and perhaps have it forever. Since after the War of Independence, after being ruled by one man, a king, the new American's decided to change the system. And being big believers in the Bible, they turned to the way Moses had things set up in the book of Judges, and followed the many people rule. Where everyone is accounted for, and not one will be able to rule alone.


    Back to the present time: this problem is still being shown that democracy is weak. And since most of the countries aren't built on Christianity, they won't understand about Moses. Recently, China is becoming a Christian country. Although still in the baby steps of it all, some countries see Christianity as a good thing. So if they learn that China is becoming a Christian country, they might follow them. When I see Trump, I see this old man who just wants ''to make America great again''. I don't believe it, some one could always say things just to get what they want. And Hillary? No. Just no. Some one who deletes 30,000 emails with vital information on them, needs to not become our president. Now if one of these two will become our president, all Hell will break loose. Perhaps a Third World War? Or maybe a calm way of transferring the power to China. I really do believe, and have for a long time that a different country would take over the power of America. If it's China, so be it.

     If someone came up to me and asked me how I would run my own country. I would tell them that I would first elected one man to be ruler, then let his family decide who would come next to power. Whether if it was a daughter or son, I wouldn't care. As long as they were raised to believe in the right things, I would be pleased with who they are. I'd rather have a one man ruler, then a multitude of people trying to take the lead for themselves. 

世論 (Public Opinion)

      Public opinion. Is it really so important? Well, it can be, if one really want's to be. However those who need it to be important are those who might be wanting to get rid of it. The nature of this problem is starting to really get slippery, many want people to shut up and the newspaper that they wrote and listen to those words instead. It's sad that someone is doing this, trying to get rid of people's right to speak, or give an opinion. When someone wants another to keep their feelings to themselves, it makes me want to go and find them and give a good beating. Unfortunately, I'd be arrested for standing up for myself. If someone needs to change the nature of this, we need someone who is willing to write the truth about people who aren't celebrities. And writing about their lives full of lies. Our sources of public opinion obviously come from the general public, but they can come from our own selves as well. But what kind of sources? well there is protesting. But what kind of good does protesting really do? Nothing. Why? Because all the person really is doing is complaining about the situation, they really aren't doing anything. Complaining only drags out an argument for to long, if your going to protest, don't go walking around with signs saying things like, "Taxes are unfair!" or, "I need a safe place!" Things like this get word around, but just annoys the people you're protesting to. Instead people should straight up go to the person they really want to talk to. They should bring witnesses so that the other person won't give up so easily. Now, with that being said. Getting people riled up is a good thing, just don't have people protest on streets to much.

   Are there consequences with public opinion? Absolutely. Never think that your free speech is going to come without some form of a consequence, because it won't. A consequence could be that someone might call the police on you, another could be that you might have disagreement among your ranks and lose members. Even to those who trying to oppose public opinion, might have consequences in trying to disband your protest. You could return with even more numbers and ignore the police threats, or they might be successful and lose you entirely. Whatever the case, there are consequences on both sides of the coin.

   So once again. Is public opinion really important? Yes it can. As long as you don't abuse it, and as long as you believe that it really is important. Because giving a public opinion should always be important even to those who believe it should be dumped off somewhere, laid to rest. Give your opinion always, so that if someone came up to you and said to shut up, you will be able to tell them what you want to say even if they don't agree. Many people will not agree with your logic, even friends. But it is good to give advice and hear it at the same time, especially from friends. In the end, the will be there for you no matter what. After all, they'll probably be in that protest you made, alongside of you.

言論の自由(Free Speech)

              On October 16 2016. Jennifer Schuessler, a writer from the New York Times wrote about students in collages and universities who protested about free speech. She wrote about how many students, (who were under the age of 35, said by Albert Mohler) wanted to have more of a environment where they could feel safe to say things they wanted. There should be nothing wrong with free speech, but unfortunately some of the professors did not want their pupils to say things that might hurt their own feelings. These professors have somewhat of a good idea, however this would only apply to those students that who what to be rude and try and push buttons on the professors nerves. Having students who want free speech has happened before.
 
As Albert Mohler wrote, "the Baby Boomers and the political liberalism that was very much their cause during the 1960s on America's collage and universities campus, the Baby Boomers demanded free speech." He also goes on to state that this 'free speech', went on before then, even in the 1780s because of the First Amendment in the Constitution. Freedom of speech was, is, and will always be something people want. People only express their passion for free speech, when they feel threaten that it might disappear. Even the young America fought back, when it felt under attack by Britain. And they fought not just for the protection of land rights, but also freedom of speech. If you think about it just right, Americans had something to say to Britain. This is why the Declaration of Independence was sent to the English. America said want they want, and the opposing party was offended by this.


            Back to the students. They feel like they can't say things they want, now most of those students aren't the rude ones. So it is completely fine with them wanting to protest. The opposing party,(The professors) do not want the students having this privilege. History and The Constitution completely point out that there is almost no point for the professors to even fight against the students, because the students are in the right. However, those professors might had a winning chance against the students. This is because of other people who are very much the same as the those professors, same age range, same beliefs, and quite possibly the same ''rebellious" children. And those other people are... judges. Judges mostly have the same views and beliefs as those professors, but fortunately, it was the students who won their protest rights. But the question is, will there be more of these incidents? And will they be always the same result? This all falls on whether or not the older people get offended. words only offend people if those people want to take it offensive. "Bricks and Stones may break my bones, but Words cannot offend me." 



What happened to that saying in peoples everyday lives? The only reason people get offend really is because, of the truth being spat right in their own lying face. People can't and don't want to face the truth. There are many reasons, one is reputation, another could be embarrassment, and another could be exposure to having to deal with something that person tried to hide for a while. People need to hear the truth, otherwise, that person will never know how to improve. But those who don't want to hear the truth will never improve, because they are stubborn. Those older people don't want to be told what to do because they believe, because they are older, they don't need to improve. This is false! All kinds of people need to improve; even those who are close to their death bed. Everyone has a choice to give up their feelings and give in, this includes believing in Jesus Christ. So anyone has a choice to change and give up their feelings. And those who are older and already have, bless them. And those who haven't, no cursing. prey for them. That is why America was made in the first place, freedom of prayer. So if students can't have freedom of speech, Christians might loose their freedom of prayer. So... we should pray for those who believe that free speech should be taken away. Because once they give up their feelings, they will be free.
      
         The new generation needs to make sure that freedom of speech isn't taken away. Because once it is, no one can say what needs to be said. Truth is important. Therefore, the truth needs to be set free. So that no one can say, "Please stop! That hurts my feelings!" (with their whining voice.) when the truth is said right in their face. Let us, the new generation of young adults, be able to change the way of these whiny, older adults. So that we don't have a nation in chaos.           

タイタンの内戦 (The Civil War of the Titans)

During the ten months after the Constitutional Convention, an "standing miracle" occurred. The Debate in Virginia began. You had Federalists on one side, and Antifederalists on the other. The Federalists were an outgoing, energetic, and loud party. While the Antifederalists tried to make their points in a quiet manner. Antifederalists were considered "men of little faith" by a historian who thought that saying was meant for bad. The Antifederalists were "men of little faith", they had little faith, and feared for the new government that may have come. The Anti's didn't want a consolidated government, because a government such as that would be hungry for power. So the Anti's moved forward the idea of having a "we the people" kind of government, having representatives for all of the citizens of the U.S to understand what the people want.  James Madison told the Anti's that no one could exist, it would have to much authorities who would want to take over for their own selfish gain. However the Anti's retaliated with their proud words of how that these representatives would be protecting Americans from hostile takeovers from the Revolutionary War, by having these people with true republican faith. What the Federalists wanted to do was to contest a offer of coherent rebuttal that made the Constitution look like a rescue, rather then a betrayal. Later in the debate, Madison and Hamilton were presenting almost the same facts in the same way, so the teammates had to split up. But it wasn't just for the same facts, they even started arguing about some of each others beliefs. Madison was starting to somewhat agree about having a "we the people" government, While Hamilton was strongly disagreeing. Thus the splitting up.
Later in November and December of 1788, the Publius essays where written. The Essays reiterated the arguments he had made in Philadelphia. Alliances were made, but they were unstable forms of government. So they weren't going to last, but they ended up with the Federalists, so they lasted a bit longer.
In the following January of 1789, Madison's message began to change. He felt that the Anti's where on the right track, although he didn't join them. He still believed that the Anti's weren't that far off from making the right kind of government for their new country. Madison then explained the new way of his feelings to everyone, some agreed, others didn't. Therefore, he wanted to change his position in his group and step down for a little while. Later a man named Patrick Henry entered into the debate, this roused suspicion for Madison. He didn't like the way he smelled, which was like a "rat".
Madison then stepped back in to try and stop this madness. Madison unfortunately was right, Henry was throwing "thunderbolt" speeches left and right just to hide his true intentions. Henry blocked passage for several years of the bill for religious freedom, which was what started the entire pilgrim, and Revolutionary War was founded on. But the way Henry spoke to the people, made them believe in him. Madison had to persuade the people to listen to reason, thus the begin of the Clash of the Titans. Henry was animated, passionate, spoke without notes, and combined the appearance of an actor and a powerful minister in a big church. Where as Madison was calm with his words, so calm that the stenographer couldn't hear most of his words. Madison appeared in a humble manner, and used notes to appear professional. John Marshall said that "Mr. Henry without a doubt the greatest power to persuade". Whereas "Mr. Madison had the greatest power to convince. Because Henry was very loud and outgoing, that he fired a full salvo aimed to strike every single premise in the Federalist case for ratification. Then America was close to anarchy, and the Articles were about to expire? No these are just scarred citizens who feared Henry and his voice. However Henry believed that the Virginian economy was agreeing with Henry, and then minding there own business. It was sort of a "pursuit of happiness", how they would agree on the outside, but completely disagree on the inside. Arguments began about the Articles, some believed they were inaccurate. "The Confederation..." someone said, "carried us through a long and dangerous war. It rendered us victorious in that bloody conflict with a powerful nation. It has secured us a territory greater then any European monarch possesses. And shall a Government this strong and vigorous be accused of imbecility for want of energy?" What this means is that this person had doubts on having Henry or some one like him, to be leading the new country. Then later, people started to understand the "We the people." Because if the debaters said "we the states." Then the new Americans wouldn't feel together as one nation. There fore they kept we the people. Later Henry objected to the claim that Virginia's deliberations were merely an irrelevant epilogue to a story with a foregone conclusion. Although most of the little nation agreed with the plan, Henry wanted to change there minds and have them see his side of his view. However if the entire nation agreed with him, then he would reject. This would probably be, because the entire nation would then surrender and give up. Henry may have been irrational, but I don't think he was that irrational. Over the next few days, Madison delivered two lengthy speeches that took the form of a point-by-point rebuttal of Henry's presentation. These two undisputed champions couldn't be in any one of the groups because of the way they thought, almost to a point where they had to be kicked out of the debate. However, there speeches were so good, that they just couldn't be taken away from the debates.
Much time later, Henry then argued about how the Constitution may have created a consolidated government that essentially annihilated state power. If he read it carefully, the Henry might have a winning chance for his side. However, Madison observed that his own fears were about to vanish. Because he then discovered that the idea might have been a unique creation. Madison said, "It is in a manner unprecedented... It stands by itself. In some respects it is a Government of a federal nature; in others it is of a consolidated nature." This 'hybrid' creature rendered Henry's flamboyant accusations irrelevant because "We the people" did not refer to "the people as composing one great body --- but the people as composing thirteen separate sovereignties." It seemed that Henry wasn't fully comprehending the significance of the entire nation. Hoverer Henry adjusted to the whole idea and eventually agreed to it, but not whole heartily. Madison concluded, "is of a complication, and this complication, I trust, will be found to exclude the evils of absolute consolidation, as well of a mere confederacy." (This was said about the proposal of the Constitution)
The genius of Madison's argument for a version of sovereignty that was at once shared and divided raised the whole pragmatic and politically painful compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention to the level of a novel political discovery: to wit, the notion that government was not about providing answers, but rather about providing framework in which the salient questions could continue to be debated.
Instead of fatal weakness, the debate survived without Bloodshed to help. Words inflicted damage, instead of bullets or swords. The Debate ended in one of the best ways possible. However in later times, minor and major civil wars would eventually break out. Even when the Debate was over, many of the men in it would fight each other just to "prove themselves"  to each other. The Debate ended in Federalist's favor, with slight alterations to adjust to the living standards for the "people." Over all, the Debate ended. Some pleased, others not. And Thus the beginning for the new country.        

拳銃とバラ (Guns & Roses)

When I started watching debate I immediately thought to myself, "Oh boy this is going to be interesting." And as I kept watching, it definitely saw many interesting points brought out from both of them. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton both like to get all of "their truths'' out, but also like to point out each other's mistakes. This seem to me to be a normal response for trying to run for president, but the way they said their remarks where childish. When it came to the economic problem, Trump says that we should be receiving more money from the countries that owe us. Hillary says that we should lower prices on a lot of things such as collage and taxes, she also states that middle class families would be getting more outcome. Trump told the audience that many American companies are leaving America, because they aren't getting paid enough in this country. It makes sense why Trump wants to build a wall between Mexico and America. And not just for business sake, but also for the sake of immigrants who come into the U.S without permission and want to kill people. Trump believes that using a little brute force, we can keep some terrorists in check. Hillary wants to "talk" her way through all the tough times. Many times throughout the debate when a true fact was aimed at Hillary, she would smile really big, and creepily. When she was smiling, Trump was sending the truths. And when Hillary sent remarks and Trump he would usually say, "I never said that.", "I didn't say that." or "That's not true."
My feelings about this debate make me more disgusted then angry, most people say they 'hate' Trump and Hillary. I wouldn't say I hate them, it would more be like they are disturbing to me.
As they kept going with the debate,(which more turned into teen fighting) some questions about trying to keep peace were asked. Now obviously peace can't exist without war, and vise versa. Hillary promised a world that would be buddy, buddy with every country by ''talking it out''. Where as Trump sated that NATO should step in with the U.S and take down all terrorism. Now Trump isn't a guy we should be giving praise to, by full filling some of these promises, we would have to in to debt just a little more in order for the big picture to be completely free of debt. This is a risky move on Trump's part.
Now most of Hillary's fact's hail from her website with all the "facks"(facts, but she said facks XD) which she obviously created those facts herself. Trump also has a website, and I believe that he may have put some of his own "facts" on it as well.
They even talked about racism, and how cops where shooting more African Americans and Hispanic people more then White people. Trump stated that we needed to build a better police force. Where as Hillary said that we just simply need to "Take away Guns." ... Not this Sh!t again! I've had enough people being 99.99% scarred to death. Trump even responded to this by saying that taking away guns isn't going to save anything.

After all of this, if someone had me at gunpoint and said which one would I vote for. I would say Donald Trump. His Intentions seem to be good after the debate, and I believe that we need a little violence to kick start the Great America again. It's about time we need someone who knows exactly what is good for our country.